Sunday 8 March 2015

Seraiki National Congress (Manssor Karim Sial)


[An introduction paper of Sain Mansoor Karim Sial on "Seraiki National Congress." It is being published for the purpose of information dissemination and public discussion.]



Seraiki National Congress

Preamble
Seraiki people have been aspiring to achieve their rights, including the recognition of their culture, linguistic and ethnic identity, and have been demanding their separate unit/entity in the federation of Pakistan. On their part, they have successfully gained the status of large distinct group of people enjoying a unique historical, social and cultural background which is a fait accompli. But the state of Pakistan, so far, refuses to recognize it as separate federal unit under the constitution of Pakistan. With every passing day people’s struggle to achieve their legitimate right of autonomy is intensifying. At the same time those nations of Pakistan who don’t agree to Seraikis demand are launching various reactive offensives against the peaceful Seraiki people. At this historical juncture Seraiki leadership, which mainly comes from the middle classes, is poised to reorganize itself so as to give impetus to the ongoing Seraiki national movement. In fact, Seraiki activists are asking their people “what happened to you?” why your forefathers let your people get massacred by invaders, why didn’t they check the hand of the oppressors and resist, the onslaught of violent destroyers of your sanctity and dignity? Why? Why? Because my forefathers were divided under their rulers, they were caused to lose their nation hood.” To answer, Seraiki National Congress (SNC) comes forward, and aims at carving out the strategies to help Seraiki movement meet success. 

Difficulties Facing Seraiki Movement

The main obstacle, all along, has been the nation /state building processes prevalent in Pakistan. During the first decade the rulers—de facto as well as de jure—predominantly belonged to the migrant population and obviously they couldn’t fathom the multi-ethnic, multinational and multi-cultural essence of the landmass then called West Pakistan. So, instead of re-organizing it into various ethno-national entities and hence provinces, they made efforts to create one-unit status for all the nations of the present–day Pakistan.  And hence the nationalist aspirations and urges of the various people were rather suppressed or ignored. At the same time these processes encouraged the people to direct their energies towards gaining the consciousness of security, religiosity and one-ness of all citizens (one language, one nation, religion and so on). In line with this the state oppressed those nations—Sindhi, Baloch and Pakhtuns—who resisted the offensive of one-ness. Under these circumstances the emerging ethno-national feelings of Seraikis were harassed; so they stood subdued.

Second difficulty, which was closely linked to the aforementioned main one, was the political agenda or political cards which were played during the first two decades. The ruling elite harped on the Kashmir card, strong defense, allying with the western powers and anti-India postures. In this context the kind of politics suited to this environment automatically became pro-dictatorship, pro-autocracy and anti-democratic. The nations like Bangalis, Sindhi, Baloch and Pakhtuns who were fighting for the recognition of their own identity could make little efforts in favor of the emerging ethnic groups.
After 1972, when the futility and erroneousness of the abovementioned nation building process were established, and the present Pakistan started a new political course, the federation could have re-organized itself. it was due to more than a century old militarization of  the Punjab which gave rise to the predominance of Punjabis and Punjabi nationalism in the state apparatus that the parliamentary politics failed to tackle the issue of multi-ethnicity. In other words, this dispensation indemocratic politics didn’t resolve the national question in Pakistan. Accordingly, Seraiki movement in the form of Bahawalpur SoobaMahaz was co-opted by the government of the time which transformed into the expanded form to become Seraiki SoobaMahaz.
At fourth place, as the nations which were sympathetic to Seraiki people, such as Sindhi, Baloch and Pakhtuns, were themselves oppressed provinces and were striving to obtain their legitimate share in the federation these couldn’t pay much supportive attention to the Seraiki national movements—Seraiki being the most prominent then. Nevertheless they welcomed the initiatives taken to raise the Seraiki issue in the open forums. In short, the first wave of Seraiki awareness started in seventies with the encouragement of the political activists of these oppressed provinces such as NAP AND PNP.
Fifth, besides the causes extraneous to the Seraiki region and people, the road blocks facing the Seraiki movement were and are primarily within the Seraiki Vasaib. It goes without saying that norms, behaviors and cultural traits are evolved under the influence of social, political and historical environment of a society or national grouping. As Seraikis mostly opted for nonviolence and hence practiced peaceful coexistence among its various regions or their statehoods. For instance State of Bahawalpur, Multan, Deragaat. co-existed side by side in different eras. Due to this, which once would have been an appreciable quality of the people and rulers, the whole Seraiki vasaib didn’t come under one rule and thus lacked one single state formation. That’s probably the reason that political activists belonging to the Seraiki movement adopted different groupings with divergent positions for the same main purpose of Seraiki autonomy. As a resultant the leadership of Seraiki movement is acutely fragmented and lacks unity and expansion.
Sixth, the economic elite or wealthy and powerful families and individuals, which generally support and push the agenda of national aspiration, has not opted to enter the Seraiki movement; instead they prefer to become the part of the Pakistani elite, notwithstanding the exception of a few. Overall the activists are very passionate to lead their own little organizations than becoming a part/worker of an existing political set-up.

Need of the Hour

Despite the difficulties, obstacles and challenges, Seraiki movement has elapsed a significant distance towards its goals. All it lacks is the organizational quality among its rank and file, a political maturity to withstand the challenges in running an organization and democratic attitude in dealing with the affairs of a political movement. In nutshell, common people want to see the unity among the various political parties of Seraiki populace. SNC takes this challenge and wants to create a system and modus operandi under which Seraiki movement will gain strength and profile.

Objectives

1.       Providing a forum for debates and discussions on the issues relevant to the advancement of Seraiki political movement and its organizations.
2.       Playing the role of consensus building platform on issues and action plans among the various sections of Seraiki activists as well as among various Seraiki organizations.
3.       Acting as a forum for organizing factors essential for land & agricultural reforms, law & judicial reforms, education, health and election reforms and so many others.
4.       Facilitating the launch of joint actions to take forward the Seraiki national movement.
5.       Creating a permanent structure for holding All nationalist Parties Conferences (ANPC) for developing a collective response to the issues and challenges facing the movement.
6.       Developing positions and stands on various sectors and political / social aspects, such as water, agriculture, infrastructure, basic facilities, extremism, and foreign policy issues, and demographic controls etc. etc. The wording the contents of such positions would be agreed by all the participant parties and they would endorse the final version.
7.       Clarifying and expounding various concepts such as ‘inter-nation relations and social progress’, ‘administrative, ‘linguistic’, ‘national democracy’, ‘national question’, ‘national movement’, ‘nationalism’, ‘federalism’, ‘multinational/nation-state’, ‘provincial autonomy’, etc. etc.
8.       Countering the propaganda and other methods of creating confusions about Seraiki movement and its objectives that is generally carried out by hostile forces.
9.       Promoting a culture of friendship and accommodation among various social and political groupings of the movement.



Seraiki National Congress
Mansoor Karim Seyal,
Midcity, Seyal Arcade.
Sher shah road, Multan.
Tell: 03007388711